For information on exhibition and sponsorship opportunities at the conference, contact Yvonne Romaine at yromaine@oreilly.com
Download the Where 2.0 Sponsor/Exhibitor Prospectus
Download the Media & Promotional Partner Brochure (PDF) for information on trade opportunities with O'Reilly conferences or contact mediapartners@ oreilly.com
For media-related inquiries, contact Maureen Jennings at maureen@oreilly.com
To stay abreast of conference news and to receive email notification when registration opens, please sign up for the Where 2.0 Conference newsletter (login required)
Have an idea for Where to share? Tell us!
View a complete list of Where 2.0 contacts
Following innovation comes standardization. The open source JavaScript library Mapstraction has been at the forefront, but some see it as a watered down version of other maps. In that sense, standardization means squelching innovation by only including the union of all feature-sets.
The title of this panel asks a question: how open should mapping APIs be? It is not a yes or no question, but rather a gradient. The APIs likely should not be either completely open nor completely closed. The speakers, themselves representatives of the companies behind these innovative APIs, disagree about where we should aim on the spectrum between open and closed.
There is much more to location technology than web mapping. Nevertheless, much of the user-facing data ends up being plotted with mapping APIs. How this landscape looks in five years will be greatly impacted by the answer to the question this panel is being asked to discuss.
Adam DuVander helps people create on the web. He has been a contributor to Webmonkey, Wired’s Web developer resource, since 2000. His location-related work for BestPlaces.net has been seen on MSN, Yahoo and the Wall Street Journal.
DuVander founded Portland Web Innovators and sits on the board of non-profit Legion of Tech. He is currently writing an online mapping book for No Starch Press from his home in Portland, Oregon.